children playing

Social investment policies in Canada, Australia, Japan, and South Korea

Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 2011, Vol. 5, No.1, 41-53
Author: 
Peng, Ito
Publication Date: 
31 May 2011
AVAILABILITY

The International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy has now posted all of their articles (current and back issues) online in full-text for the general public. Find more articles by searching or browsing the journal's website.

Abstract:

This paper compares the social investment policy reforms that have been introduced by the two Anglo-Saxon liberal welfare regimes of Canada and Australia and the two East Asian welfare regimes of Japan and South Korea since the 1990s. The paper examines the causes of these social policy changes, and asks why these seemingly different contexts produce such similar policy ideas. While all four countries share similar broad ideational template and language of social investment, they differ in terms of their target groups and policy instruments. Whereas Canada and Australia have focused their social investment policies on children through ECEC (what I call an "invest in the future" model); Japan and South Korea have approached social investment from a more general human capital and economic activation perspective (what I call a "human capital activation" model). As a result, social investment policies in these countries have targeted more broadly on children, women, and the elderly. I argue that these differences in social investment approaches stem from the differences in their social, political and economic contexts, and the political economic legacies.

Region: